Dec. 29 2009

Vice Magazine Interview with David Simon

  • VM: Why does reform seem so impossible?
  • DS: We live in an oligarchy. The mother’s milk of American politics is money, and the reason they can’t reform financing, the reason that we can’t have public funding of elections rather than private donations, the reason that K Street is K Street in Washington, is to make sure that no popular sentiment survives. You’re witnessing it now with health care, with the marginalization of any effort to rationally incorporate all Americans under a national banner that says, “We’re in this together.”
  • VM: But then the critics of a system like that immediately cry socialism.
  • DS: And of course it’s socialism. These ignorant motherfuckers. What do they think group insurance is, other than socialism? Just the idea of buying group insurance! If socialism is a taint that you cannot abide by, then, goddamn it, you shouldn’t be in any group insurance policy. You should just go out and pay the fucking doctors because when you get 100,000 people together as part of anything, from a union to the AARP, and you say, “Because we have this group actuarially, more of us are going to be healthier than not and therefore we’ll be able to carry forward the idea of group insurance and everybody will have an affordable plan...” That’s fuckin’ socialism. That’s nothing but socialism.
  • VM: It is, literally.
  • DS: So the whole idea of group insurance, which of course everyone believes in, like that fellow on YouTube, “Don’t let the government take away my Medicare…” You look at that and you think there’s only one thing that can make people this stupid, and that’s money. When you pay people to change their votes on the basis of money, the wrong shit gets voted for. That’s American democracy at this point. And you get to the Senate and you’re looking at 100 votes, which don’t represent anything in terms of popular representation. When 40 percent of the population controls 60 percent of the votes in the higher house of a bicameral legislature, it’s an oligarchy.

Nov. 04 2009

kratlee:

Dear Registered Voter:

The New Jersey Campaign Contributions and Expenditures Reporting Act (N.J.S.A. 19:44A-37) provides that a statement, not exceeding 500 word, from each candidate for election to the office of Governor, who wishes a statement mailed on his or her behalf, shall be mailed with the sample ballots for the 2009 general election to each registered voter in this State to assist the voters in making their determination among the candidates. Attached herewith are statements from the candidates for Governor in the 2009 general election who chose to submit such statements.

New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission

———

this is what i was reading on the bus ride home tonight, trying to be an educated voter. i’m pretty sure it was copied and pasted directly from creed’s blog.

my favorite part is the end: “Steinforgovernor.com for details. Political sites stink. Why go? See my favorite, ‘music and variety’ on you-tube links. Is my taste impeccable; vote? 5 months ago I had no idea this was on the internet, maybe you didn’t? One’s amazing; Al Greens. ‘Average folks’ like us contributed these….you’ll see.”

so introspective.

Oct. 14 2009

Jan. 20 2009

Nov. 15 2008

NYT Mag Interview, 11/14/08

  • Deborah Solomon: What kind of funny stamps?
  • Karl Rove: Stamps.
  • ...
  • Deborah Solomon: Did I say that?
  • Karl Rove: Yes, you did. I’ve got it on tape. I’m going to transcribe this and send it to you.

Nov. 14 2008

First Casualty of the Obama Administration

urg:

Last night while on Facebook, I noticed that I was unable to access the account of a close friend. A friend in whose wedding I served as a bridesmaid. Thinking it was a Facebook glitch, I e-mailed her this morning to check in.

She wrote back saying that due to things that were said during the election, she thought it best to remove me as a friend.

I’ll be the first to say that my passions were ignited during the election season, but despite the fact that Facebook “friends” made utterly racists comments in their status messages I never defriended them. While their opinions may differ from mine and I might be disgusted by their tone and content, I do see it as part of their rights to say what they think.

So, my progressive values and belief in Barack Obama cost me a friend. But, in the end, I think I got a whole lot more.

this is a legit reality of young america.  facebook (and social networks in general) introduced a whole new dynamic to self-expression and belief systems that haven’t been part of general elections past.

i’m very interested in seeing how these things develop in real-time.  this is happening now.  not “has happened with someone else” or “will be happening in the future.”  decisions about your person are being made in real-time based on opinions drawn from your digital imprints.  i’ve encountered similar situations during this election.  friends who i see socially that might oppose things i believe in or make assumptions/broad-stroke statements about one candidate or another.  then having to go meet up with them, drink a beer and talk about something completely different makes it very hard to keep a straight face.

Nov. 04 2008

WHEREAS By the authority vested in us by us, all employees in the U.S.A. are encouraged to forward this proclamation to their supervisors and if there is some doubt about said supervisors agreeableness to follow the guidelines stated herein they are further advised, in the great tradition of American Democracy, to take matters into their own hands and sneak out the back door at lunchtime leaving this web page open on their computer as a statement of their whereabouts and intentions.

Civics Lesson 101: Who really elects the President

ratcliffe-lee:

It is the Electoral College, not the popular vote, that elects the next president of the United States. Here are some facts about the Electoral College:

* There are 538 members of the Electoral College, allotted to the 50 states and District of Columbia based on their representation in the U.S. Congress. The smallest states have three members, while the most populous state, California, has 55. Washington, D.C., which has no voting representation in Congress, has three, the same as the smallest state.

* It takes 270 electoral votes to win. The electors are pledged to one candidate or the other, but there is no federal law requiring them to vote that way. In the course of U.S. history, there have been several incidents in which so-called faithless electors voted for someone other than the candidate to whom they were pledged.

* In 48 states and Washington, D.C., the candidate who wins the popular vote wins all of a state’s electors. Nebraska and Maine have a proportional system of awarding them.

* Electors, who are picked by the respective political parties, make two selections — president and vice president. They may not vote for two candidates from their own state.

* Because a candidate could run up a big vote count in some states but lose others by narrow margins, the winner of the popular vote might not have the most electoral votes. The Electoral College has three times picked the candidate who lost the popular vote — Republicans Rutherford Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888 and George W. Bush in 2000.

* The Electoral College meets in each state to cast its votes on a Monday early in December. The votes are then tallied in a joint session of Congress on January 6 of the following year.

* If no candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes, the House of Representatives chooses among the top three candidates, with each state having only one vote. If no vice presidential candidate receives a majority, the Senate decides between the top two candidates.

* The House has twice decided the outcome of the presidential race — in the 1800 and 1824 elections. The Senate decided the vice presidency once, in the 1836 election.

* This unique system was the result of a compromise by the writers of the U.S. Constitution in the 18th century between those who wanted direct popular election and those who wanted state legislatures to decide. One fear was that, at a time before U.S. political parties, the popular vote would be diluted by voting for an unwieldy amount of candidates.

(Writing by David Wiessler; editing by Stacey Joyce)

if you’re curious. today seems like a great day to learn.

Nov. 03 2008

Oct. 23 2008

PROTIP: campaign signs, especially this one, probably won’t help that sucker sell (via beedubz).